Amritsari fish vs laal maas: calories and protein compared
Short answer: for fat loss pick amritsari fish; for muscle gain laal maas does more. The numbers are per usual serving, so check the serving sizes in the table.
| Per serving | Amritsari fish | Laal maas |
|---|---|---|
| Serving | 1 plate | 1 katori · 200 g |
| Calories | 336 kcal | 371 kcal |
| Protein | 24 g | 24 g |
| Carbs | 15 g | 4 g |
| Fat | 20 g | 29 g |
| Protein per 100 kcal | 7 g | 6.5 g |
| Calories from fat | 54% | 69% |
What the numbers say
- Laal maas has 35 kcal more a serving than amritsari fish. One serving of laal maas has the calories of about 1.1 servings of amritsari fish.
- Protein is about the same (24 vs 24 g).
- For protein per calorie, amritsari fish wins with 7 g per 100 kcal.
Which to pick
- Losing fat: Amritsari fish, because it gives more protein for each calorie, which keeps you full and protects muscle.
- Building muscle: Laal maas, because it brings more protein a serving.
- Either way: the cooking fat moves both numbers most. Halving the oil or ghee is the easiest cut.